Finally we have a ‘freethinker’ who has seen the light. Still, I don’t understand why this guy can’t make his mind up to be either an agnostic or an atheist.

Don’t secularists know that these belief systems are mutually exclusive?

This is what an Atheist REALLY looks like.

I would like to start my post by saying; yes, there is no proof that god doesn’t exist but likewise there is no proof that he does. logic doesn’t found itself on unknowns, only the unknown founds itself on unknowns. but of course, having read most of your comments you reject logic, so in a way this post has an air of futility.

I saw in one of your posts that you can see god in everything around you. Of course, I can see the immense beauty in the world but no feasable, firm evidence of god’s existence. maybe it’s your interpretation of beauty, maybe it’s your rationalisation.

I suppose I’d consider myself an agnostic-atheist, to elaborate I must explain my vision of the universe and the scientific method. Man knows nothing, at least not for certain, but can make a pretty good guess depending on it’s simplicity and the assumption’s it requires. Christianity assumes there is a god- an unknown- and that all of the significant events in the bible took place ( depending on your level of liberalism).

In short, there is no complete disproof of god’s existence but due to evidence and a simpler theory which proves the evidence in the most efficient way, it is far more likely that god doesn’t exist.

And, at the risk of sounding pretentious, in the words of socrates, “He who knows he does not know is wisest”

He’s right when he says man knows nothing. Nothing in comparison to God at least, who knows how many hairs are on each of our heads.

I seriously sympathize with the confusion the poster is expressing throughout his argument. My advice is to continue to question Atheistic dogma and eventually you’ll see the light and come to the one True God.