Atheist Tries To Mock God And The Holy Spirit By Comparing Him To Invisible Pink Unicorns, Flying Spaghetti Monsters and Invisible Pixies.
Comments(12) The claim that there is an omnipotent god is not falsifiable – she could make the world however she wanted, and so no matter what observations we make, they wouldn’t contradict the theory.
Good scientific explanations, however, are falsifiable. Everything has to fit the data. God could make a creature with genes and characteristics of a plant, and some of a mammal if he wanted to, and that would be consistent with creationism.
However, an evolutionary origin of life requires that the genetic relationship of species is in the form of a hierarchical phylogenetic tree. It allows some traits to evolve independently (bats and birds can both fly – but when genetic analysis is used to find out why birds and bats can fly, the developmental pathways are different).
A good explanation fits the specific data (is not falsified), but would not fit all data (is falsifiable). I could make up any number of unfalsifiable theories – gods, invisible pink unicorns, flying spaghetti monsters, and invisible pixies in my garden – but I wouldn’t accept them and change how I live my life because of them, because evidence is only meaningful if it could falsify the explanation, and so there is no meaningful evidence for them.
However, I will give your god a chance to prove his existence to me, if you agree to do the same. Will you pray to god that we will both get 200 heads in a row from my coin (I promise you, it is two-sided, with a head and tail, with an approximately 50% chance of getting a head or tail each time).
If god wants me to believe, and you to stay believing, presumably it would be no trouble for her to influence the outcome of 200 coin tosses to make them come up heads (if not, obviously your god is not exactly omnipotent and therefore probably not worth worshiping).
If I get 200 heads in a row, I’ll become a Christian. If you get a tail before getting 200 heads, you become an atheist.
Deal?
No deal.
Why do you insist on testing God? He doesn’t want to suck up to your petty little mind games. He’s bigger than you are. He’s more of a man.
It’s obvious to me that you just think that all of this is a joke but we’ll see who is laughing on Judgment Day. I’ll be there with Jesus and we’ll be both howling with laughter as you and your primitive dog of a lover Dawkins are consumed in righteous hell fire.
I won’t be praying for your salvation. I’ll be blowing on my Trumpet, dancing in circles in pure Righteous ecstasy goading Jesus to send you further into the mire for your sins.
I don’t care if my beliefs are falsifiable or not! What does it matter anyway? When it comes down to it I know that Jesus is on my side and the same cannot be said for you.
By the way you’re obviously retarded as if a unicorn is invisible it cannot be ‘pink’.
Did you even go to school at all?
This just goes to prove even more that Atheists are illiterate extremists who are just out to be a menace to Our Christian Nation.
so the all righteous and holy god, and his son, and you (the mighty don from whose every orifice shines the holy light) are going to stand and howl with laughter whilst you burn people in a pit of fire?
things that cannot be seen can still have a colour as colour is just an energy level of elementary particles. what did you study don? i am an atheist and antitheist, i am a doctor, i have a PHD, i have a masters from cambridge, a separate bachelors from cambridge and i am currently studying at oxford for a bachelors in linguistics. but you’re right i must be uneducated.
don if you want to laugh and blow a trumpet (where the hell did you find a trumpet on judgment day?) and goad jesus into burning more people then you can’t call other people extremists
mandat
Don why won’t you
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
you are clearly to scared to;
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
do the banana argument
Ok Mandat then if you’re so smart post me exactly what’s wrong with the banana argument in the Arguing With Atheists box and I’ll counter it for you when I get a minute.
ok the banana argument.
to summarize the argument god must exist because he has created for us the mighty banana which has a special skin which is green before ripe, yellow when ripe and black when over ripe. the skin is perforated so that it peels easily. the banana has two corners on the inner curve and three on the outer curve, perfectly fitting into the human hand. the banana curves toward the face to allow for easy entry as-well as having a smooth, rounded point. it has a pleasant taste and is easily digestible, making it a perfect food source for us.
now then let us start with the fact that there are billions of organic objects in the world, its pretty unlikely that one of them won’t have these qualities.
you can’t choose one that seems to be good and say therefore it must have been god
eating more than two or three bananas is not good for you in any way.
bananas do not provide suitable sustenance to survive
god if he existed still did not create bananas. the natural version of a banana is a type of plantain. it resembles a coco pod, tastes like a potatoes and causes you to be violently sick. humans have selectively bred and genetically engineered their modern equivalents, this is why bananas are infertile. they cannot reproduce all trees have to be grafted.
bananas grow in very few areas of the world and it is only through human action that they are available
the premise of the argument is that the banana looks vaguely like a soda can (having a pull top and all) =. the soda can was designed therefore the banana was designed.
this argument is not and argument. it is full of flaws. it also does not proove anything if the banana is like this as evolution also explains the phenomenon.
there you go don, refute me all you want
Mandat
An invisible unicorn can be pink in the same manner one god can be both mortal and immortal, flesh and spirit, omnipotent and vulnerable. If there can be a holy trinity, there can be an invisible pink unicorn.
“It’s obvious to me that you just think that all of this is a joke but we’ll see who is laughing on Judgment Day. I’ll be there with Jesus and we’ll be both howling with laughter as you and your primitive dog of a lover Dawkins are consumed in righteous hell fire.”
What happened to all of us being God’s children, and him loving every one of us? Yet another contradiction in your extremist views.
Oh and ‘Don’, I know you are Christian but what particular church do you worship?
> “Why do you insist on testing God? He doesn’t want to suck up to your petty little mind games.”
But God says he will answer all prayers, even something as simple as making a coin land on heads 200 times in a row. Such a thing is not even impossible.
Here are some verses that support this.
Matthew 7:7
Ask and it will be given to you; seek and you will find; knock and the door will be opened to you.
Matthew 17:20
He replied, “Because you have so little faith. I tell you the truth, if you have faith as small as a mustard seed, you can say to this mountain, ‘Move from here to there’ and it will move. Nothing will be impossible for you.”
Mark 11:24
Therefore I tell you, whatever you ask for in prayer, believe that you have received it, and it will be yours.
John 14:12-14
I tell you the truth, anyone who has faith in me will do what I have been doing. He will do even greater things than these, because I am going to the Father. 13And I will do whatever you ask in my name, so that the Son may bring glory to the Father. 14You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.
Matthew 18:19
“Again, I tell you that if two of you on earth agree about anything you ask for, it will be done for you by my Father in heaven.
————————
So don’t claim that this is too petter for god to handle when he says he will do it if you ask. Do you have enough faith in god for him to do this? Both of you have to agree for it to happen and god will grant it. The only reason I can think of you not doing this when its clear that the scripture says it can be done is if you do not have faith it can be done.
Also regarding the Invisible Pink Unicorn, the invisible and pink part is intentional, its meant to be contradictory, like a god that can do anything and loves anyone existing in a world where innocent people suffer (they can easily stopp all suffering and being all powerful, they would not need to allow it. Being all loving they would want to stop what they could, which is everything)
I’d like to note that although the unicorn is pink, it can also be invisible. After all, infra-red is actually red, but we can’t see it with our eyes.
not strictly speaking true chris but in the normal world definition of colour you’re right.
I only just realised what I based my comment on =D
No, it is not strictly true, as I now realise lol
Not sure where my knowledge of physics went there. I’ve been watching a lot of lectures on quantum theories and I think the hard stuff may have gotten to me
atheists compare invisible pink unicorns to god for the simple fact that they both do not exist. and PLEASE dont use the word retarded to describe something as stupid, ITS OFFENSIVE!!!!!