Comments on: Atheists Believe That The Burden Of Proof Lies With Christians. What Utter Nonsense.. http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html Atheism Is Evil. Fri, 10 Sep 2010 14:31:39 -0500 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: Atheism New Zealand http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-4310 Atheism New Zealand Sun, 25 Jul 2010 07:35:45 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-4310 Richard Dawkins and his way of speaking has helped me make a nice clean transition from superstitious thinking and illogical religious belief to rational thinking and reason. My life has never been better. Richard Dawkins and his way of speaking has helped me make a nice clean transition from superstitious thinking and illogical religious belief to rational thinking and reason. My life has never been better.

]]> By: devil http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3946 devil Wed, 26 May 2010 15:41:20 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-3946 idiots. fuck god. idiots. fuck god.

]]> By: Nicolas Hawtrey http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3734 Nicolas Hawtrey Mon, 12 Apr 2010 19:37:45 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-3734 Make your case for the justification of the murder of the unborn I am not an atheist, but I have a point of view which would merit supporting abortion. In a 'Doctor Who and the Daleks' episode in the 1960s, there was a sequence where the daleks were ladling out brains, one brain to each dalek.(their creation) About the same time we had the tragedy of babies being born deformed, as a side-effect of the drug Thalidomide. There was also at the time, I believe, a tacit understanding among doctors that if a baby was deformed or 'incompletely made up, the doctors could just turn it over, so the babies were never quickened into breathing. So if one were a soul waiting for the right body to inhabit,wouldn't it be better not to be condemned to be 'ladled' into a deformed body, but to have the chance to be welcomed into a rosy, healthy 'normal' body? So in circumstances like this I would approve of abortion, but where some parents are careless or irresponsible, I would be against abortion, as it can be harmful to the mother , and a sort of manslaughter of the unborn child. Making abortion illegal can lead to many problems, with 'witches' or 'wise-women' clandestinely carrying out abortions, which can lead to septicemia and all sorts of complications. I think raving and ranting about the subject is unproductive, unless of course you like raving and ranting; because every case is different and should be considered carefully on its own merits. Anyhow: Good luck, Good health and God Bless You. Nicolas Hawtrey Burgundy, France. Make your case for the justification of the murder of the unborn
I am not an atheist, but I have a point of view which would merit supporting abortion.
In a ‘Doctor Who and the Daleks’ episode in the 1960s, there was a sequence where the daleks were ladling out brains, one brain to each dalek.(their creation)
About the same time we had the tragedy of babies being born deformed, as a side-effect of the drug Thalidomide. There was also at the time, I believe, a tacit understanding among doctors that if a baby was deformed or ‘incompletely made up, the doctors could just turn it over, so the babies were never quickened into breathing.
So if one were a soul waiting for the right body to inhabit,wouldn’t it be better not to be condemned to be ‘ladled’ into a deformed body, but to have the chance to be welcomed into a rosy, healthy ‘normal’ body?

So in circumstances like this I would approve of abortion, but where some parents are careless or irresponsible, I would be against abortion, as it can be harmful to the mother , and a sort of manslaughter of the unborn child.
Making abortion illegal can lead to many problems, with ‘witches’ or ‘wise-women’ clandestinely carrying out abortions, which can lead to septicemia and all sorts of complications.

I think raving and ranting about the subject is unproductive, unless of course you like raving and ranting; because every case is different and should be considered carefully on its own merits.

Anyhow: Good luck, Good health and God Bless You.

Nicolas Hawtrey Burgundy, France.

]]> By: An Acolyte http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3723 An Acolyte Sun, 11 Apr 2010 20:42:05 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-3723 One old good man once said if you are being attacked (verbaly), you most likely have something inside your personality that still allows attacking.. I would be really tired from continious discussions that actually ended0 up calling each other ignorant fools (ok, they start the same way).. Maybe each people have his or her own way to go, and maybe it is better to start by observing oneself just to notice the feeling and thought set (state) in which one thinks that he/she is in contact with God/Universe/whatever name one assigns (its just ONES assumption that its how it should sound, nothing wrong with that, unless that person starts forcing others to call the same name - they might not percieve world the same way, hence the naming differences), and maybe try to ask if another person has ever been in such state.. Otherwise, you are having really constructive discussion - one says rock is hard, another says you cant take water in hands.. Now imagine if one called water the rock and another called water the water :) In this state authors case, could be the proudness of inteligence (not too bad imho, as far as its in borders (i.e. you don't feel superiour).. But well who am i to say so, and i wrote this having no idea about the authors personalities, nor if they just aren't playing.. Live, Love, Evolve :) One old good man once said if you are being attacked (verbaly), you most likely have something inside your personality that still allows attacking.. I would be really tired from continious discussions that actually ended0 up calling each other ignorant fools (ok, they start the same way).. Maybe each people have his or her own way to go, and maybe it is better to start by observing oneself just to notice the feeling and thought set (state) in which one thinks that he/she is in contact with God/Universe/whatever name one assigns (its just ONES assumption that its how it should sound, nothing wrong with that, unless that person starts forcing others to call the same name – they might not percieve world the same way, hence the naming differences), and maybe try to ask if another person has ever been in such state..
Otherwise, you are having really constructive discussion – one says rock is hard, another says you cant take water in hands.. Now imagine if one called water the rock and another called water the water :)
In this state authors case, could be the proudness of inteligence (not too bad imho, as far as its in borders (i.e. you don’t feel superiour).. But well who am i to say so, and i wrote this having no idea about the authors personalities, nor if they just aren’t playing..
Live, Love, Evolve :)

]]> By: Aaron http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-3140 Aaron Wed, 06 Jan 2010 01:12:17 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-3140 It is funny how true this arguement is. And your response consisted simply of saying "You'll go to hell" and then proceeding to prove the entire arguement correct. Its comical an ironic really. An atheist tries a different approach to an arguement, saying how close-minded devout christians are to logic, and the close-minded devout christian states that the entire arguement is false without supporting his evidence. It is funny how true this arguement is. And your response consisted simply of saying “You’ll go to hell” and then proceeding to prove the entire arguement correct. Its comical an ironic really. An atheist tries a different approach to an arguement, saying how close-minded devout christians are to logic, and the close-minded devout christian states that the entire arguement is false without supporting his evidence.

]]> By: Mel http://antiatheism.info/atheists-believe-that-the-burden-of-proof-lies-with-christian.html/comment-page-1#comment-2930 Mel Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:06:37 +0000 http://antiatheism.info/?p=323#comment-2930 What does the Bible or religion or anyone have to say about the type of bullying called mobbing and gangstalking and why is it only certain people seem to be singled out for this type of bullying and abuse and why are the police and firemen, etc, in on doing the bullying? What does the Bible or religion or anyone have to say about the type of bullying called mobbing and gangstalking and why is it only certain people seem to be singled out for this type of bullying and abuse and why are the police and firemen, etc, in on doing the bullying?

]]>