Religion makes me very angry, the reason being that so many awful, terrible things have happened throughout history in its name. How is this right and how is it that this should still be happening, right this very minute. It fascinates me that there is something in this world that powerful. I am not one to criticise Theists for their beliefs as I do understand some of the logic behind it, but I ask only this – please don’t hurl abuse at us and attempt to send us to hell for using an ability we were all born with and that is natural. Most of us just find it interesting, I know I do for that is the reason I wrote this comment. If you read back over this list of comments it is a cracking good read.

You want me to prove Dawkins exists? Existence is a feeble term. To one extent, one could describe existence as the realistic manifestation of a concept or idea. Following this line of thought, both God and Dawkins could be described as existence. Our perception of reality is the only reality we are currently aware of, and since we make your realities our own, anything could exist: Dawkins’ body, and a sight in God in everything there is. Though this hand is a vague one to follow, the argument could be made, but not strongly.

An (and I emphasize an) actual definition of the term existence is: to have actual conscious; mortal existence. To be mortal means to be subject to death; a transitory life. By this definition, of what what we are aware of, Dawkins would exist, since we define him as mortal. And God? Being immortal? I’m afraid he does not.

Again, I’ll counter argument, by stating the idea that these definitions were spawned from the minds of men, and so can be debatable in interpretation of a definition, despite the concept.

In short sir, with all due respect, asking for one to prove Dawkins existence is too general a task to ask of anyone. The very term is vague in itself, and so cannot be proven in anyway that requires anything else in this world. And those things would need proving by existence, and so on and so forth. This is through the eyes of the utter skeptic. Unwilling to believe what he sees. The disbelief in God? The eyes unwilling to disbelieve what he cannot see. The world is blind by assuming they, and only they, are correct.

I’ve been to both sides, so I’m as unbiased as they come. However, please judge your wordings and tone more carefully when writing. Last time I checked, some of the greatest minds of our humanity were far from “dumb.” Evolution? it’s being taught and accepted around the world still today. Why? Because it works. Perhaps your God meant it that way, but denying the proof behind it, is ignorant. Simply stating it “sucks” sounds childish and unreasoned. And for Dawkins to be the anti-christ, that would require him to gain immaense power and persuasion throughout the world before his death. Last time I checked, he’s an outspoken Aethiest who has conferences on occasion. He’s lacks any sort of large political or economic power, and what social power he DOES have, he has not enough to work anything with. And his age and belief will not help him in aquiring any MORE power. I’m hoping you’ve read the bible, and if so, you know that the anti-christ will rise as does the rapture.

Watch your words, and your call-outs to others. Because someday, someone like me will come along. Some one with a big mouth, an open mind, and a frustration for all who purposely throw up their blinders.

Talk to me. We’ll chat. Have a good one.

can you say sissy?

i’ll be back later to leave a proper comment